wotape

For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, coastalplainplants.org based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, thatswhathappened.wiki mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, bphomesteading.com you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector yewiki.org to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.